JasonPratt wrote:Whoa... I have to admit, that was pretty nifty! {bowing in the general direction of your philosophy teacher} {making a mental note to bring this to the attention of Dr. Victor Reppert, who teaches Plato and is a Lewisian scholar}
I would suggest: Lucy = wisdom
Peter = courage
Susan = temperance
The classical numbering scheme is already swissed anyway, since Ed is not really the 'fourth' of the children (more like the third). Lucy is practically always the first on the ball in regard to Aslanic matters (with Susan being frequently dead last--the revelation from TLB really doesn't come out of plot-nowhere--so she could hardly count as 'wisdom'), and her name is old Latin for lightbearer. Plus as the youngest and most childlike, she would fit the Christian wisdom-motif.
Peter fits courage well enough (duh). And if we elide 'temperance' over to 'prudence', in both its positive and negative aspects, we get Susan's attitude. (Picked up on and expanded rather muchly in the movie, but still evident in the series.)
da-Ta?
I logically place the kids in the order they were born]Symposium[/I].)
So, then, working in that order:
I think Lucy might represent temperance, or moderation. She has that sort of simple, child-like faith I wish we all had. But she never indulges herself, really, not even indulging in good qualities. Note that, while willing, she never fights, not even in the movie. Her gifts are a healing balm and a dagger. Now, she can defend herself with a dagger, but she probably shouldn't go charging into battle. She's a temperate soldier, not looking for trouble but ready to meet it when it comes, and able to heal her friends when they are wounded in battle.
For Susan, courage is an odd fit. (I do think Susan might be considered wise, at least at first, TLB not withstanding.) But it might make sense. Maybe. In that she speaks her mind, even when she knows she might be wrong. And she's Queen Susan the Gentle, so a true courage that remains a virtue must be tempered with gentleness, lest the couragous person become vicious. Or something. I don't know. Maybe. Lewis is a genius, and I'm not.
But Peter... yes, courage would be good. But he's High King Peter, the Magnificent. He's also the oldest. Sure, he's brave and a good fighter, but he does that almost out of necessity: to protect his brothers and sisters. Now, can a wise man be bad? If so, then he's not truly wise. A truly wise man will recognize the value of virtue, and be a good man. And is a good man not courageous? Is a good man not temperate, and just? So then, Peter partakes of all 4 virtues: he is courageous on the field of battle, temperate in his ruling of all Narnia, and just in his forgiveness of Edmund.
And so wisdom is the foundation of Cair Paravel.