Postby Bobtheduck » Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:24 pm
I saw it. Let me say this: I loved everything except the girl crying "silent hill" in the first part. And the second part? Not as bad as people say, but I am always weary about revenge movies.
I'm gonna answer criticisms I've heard of this directly
1. "It's too confusing! I didn't get it (ebert and like half the reviewers out there)
Answer 1: It's not that confusing. It's pretty straightforward, in fact. [spoiler]Alessa was burned because she was considered the "incarnation" of Dahlia's sin, but Alessa was innocent. For those saying that they removed Alessa's psychic powers, she does seem to be hollywood psychic still and she split into two parts, the "dark alessa" and Sharon, what was left of the good in Sharon... Very yin yangish, but while this is somewhat complex, the overall idea isn't. Alessa made dark alessa and sharon. Rose was brought there because she chose to take care of sharon, so she could get alessa into the church to get revenge. [/spoiler] No freaking problem, seriously... It was explained far too well.
2. Why did rose talk to herself? That's so cheesy!
Answer 2. At least half the people I know IRL talk to themselves. WHen you're stressed and trying to sort things out, it really does help to verbalize your thoughts even when you're alone.
3. The dialogue was horrible!
Answer 3. Some of it, not all of it. The only corny dialogue in the movie was spoken by a. Anna b. Sharon C. Dahlia d. Cybill and e. the mob. Now, a. Anna was basically forced into retardation. It wasn't physical, but was because she was never taught things, and the way she was treated. I don't see anything wrong with the way she talked. She acted very much like a child, and it fit her charachter. b. Sharon... She had some bad lines. No way to get around it. The "Silent hiiiiill" thing in the beginning made me cringe. C. Dahlia It got unnerving after a while all those random verses that Avary just pulled out of his butt... I have to admit that was annoying, but it still fits. d. Cybill's dialogue was a LOT worse than the cult's dialogue... Of course, she was trying to sound tough, and it just didn't work. e. The mob, for what little they said, was just plain stupid... Even the most devout followers of very liturgical and ritualistic denominations and other religions don't act like freaking zombies. There was some definite hyperbole here, and it got annoying.
4. The acting was wooden, boring.
Answer 4. The cult was wooden, and Dahlia, Anna, and Christabella were, specifically, rather exaggerated, but as for Rose and Christopher, There was nothing wrong with their acting at all. I thought it worked perfectly. The "Silent hiiiiiill" part was lame, but that's just child actors... Not only that, but remember she's... Well, I won't spoil what I said in the spoiler box.
5. This is Anti-Christian.
Answer 5. - Um... Ok, the cult was a Christian based cult, so they used the Bible frequently, out of context and very theatrically. Witch burning is up there with the crusades and the inquisition of things that gave Jesus a bad name... The good church, by that I mean the orphanage, was still at fault in the way that the protestent churches in germany were at fault, even the ones that knew the holocaust was wrong they just "played their music louder" so they wouldn't hear the trains to Auswitz(sp?) So, yeah, it can portray Christianity in a bad light, but not more than history does for sure. The "Do you have faith" and "I love my daughter" is the typical humanist assertion. The real hero at the end was rose, who had no religious faith of any kind, [spoiler]brought the manifestation of Alessa's hate into the church and let her wreak havoc to avenge herself...[/spoiler] It glorified revenge and didn't even acknowledge the demonic in the Christian sense, because the "demons" were all people, albeit some people with a power that never got explained. This same sort of "personal demon" born of hate that many stories have used, borrowing loose imagery from Christianity but being nothing more than that. It was more of a vague similarity to the real demonic, while it's roots were firmly planted in Ghost stories that have been told for thousands of years.
6. The ending. Well, it was somewhat enigmatic, but the most obvious answers all seem satisfactory to me. [spoiler]Mine being the dark half and light half of the child alessa became one person again, but bringing that unexplained power that created the hell world out of silent hill brought the hell world out of silent hill (think Heather from SH3)[/spoiler]
7. Christopher's stuff should have never been in the movie.
Answer 7 - I, once again, fail to see the problem people had with him. I liked the scenes with him and officer Gucci, though it seemed he cared more for his wife and less for Sharon, perhaps because he wanted a natural child and didn't get one. So, this could be subtley blasting the father figure as uncaring and wanting simple answers instead of really taking care of Sharon. Well, if that's there it's somewhat vague, and just being truthfull there ARE guys like that. It would have been nice to have seen a loving caring man because it would have been so different, but even though the man who's cold to his kids is cliché and happens a lot more (proportionately) in movies than real life, it DOES happen. This one just happened to be one of the guys who was like that. It's not like he didn't care about Sharon at all, he was just more worried about Rose.
8. This movie was too long! I can't sit through a 2 hour trip into hell!
Answer 8. Firstly, I better not have heard ANY fans of the games say this (the shortest game, 3, took me a good 5 hours to beat, and 2 took me around 14, 4 may have been longer, even) Secondly, people don't seem to care that much when PJ is releasing his adaptations at 3+ hours, why the frigging heck would ANYONE complain about TWO HOURS??? They even cut 7 minutes out of it to trim it down, and it still felt a little bit choppy. Face it. Two hours is a good average time for any movie. Maybe I'm just not a big horror fan, maybe horror traditionally are shorter, but this wasn't simply horror. It was horror drama and adventure. Adventure usually calls for longer movies, and that's exactly what it did. I think people should shut up about the length.
9. It wasn't silent hill enough!
Answer 9. After seeing Super Mario Brothers, Final fantasy:Spirits within, and Resident Evil, people still have the nerve to say this? The first half of the movie was so 100% silent hill, it's not even funny... Or, rather, it was. I was laughing at a few scenes, not because I thought they were cheesy, but because It was just so freaking cool. Now, having [spoiler] The patient Demon's bead getting blown off, and Pyramid head's arm getting ripped up by bullets[/spoiler] did seema bit out of place, as did the scene at the end which I can only describe as very anime like (and not quite SH like) and reminding me a bit of Starship Troopers (the movie, not the book...)
10. There was no original music! It was cut and paste!
Answer 10. The music... I loved the music. True, 80% of it was straight from the games, then there was ring of fire and the other 15% was remixed from the games, but... To be honest, the games had a great soundtrack, and it worked in the movie, though there is one song they used twice which sorta sucked... Overall, though, it worked. Ebert talked about the drastic switch between industrial and soft instrumental, as if that was a bad thing. That's the genius in the soundtrack, the overarching philosophy of Silent hill, that of "simultaneous repulsion and attraction"
Now for my own comments, not just reactions to other people's comments.
The scene in the church at the end... It didn't bug me that much, except... [spoiler]What was up with the barbed wire going up Christabella's dress... That ranks up there with the two vaguely sexual Pyramid Head scenes in SH2 (the mannaquin thing and the patient demon in the stairwell)[/spoiler] It left a lot to the imagination, but I didn't want to imagine it to be honest... (Meaning that's something I didn't even want to get THAT close to seeing... Not meaning I would have rather seen it)
The janitor... I talked to a friend that denied what the Janitor did... There is no question in my mind, though... I'm glad they didn't stretch that out more than it was... At least it was subtle enough that my friend didn't even realise it happened.
The nurses... I'm sorry... They were definately the worst part, geekwise... They were so goofy. The whole scene with the nurses was just goofy. I gasped in awe at the grey children, squealed in delight at the "armless", got shivers when I heard that familiar scraping (seeing PH drag the great knife was just soo much pleasure) and... Well, I've never liked the cockroaches, even in the games, so didn't think much of them, though I thought one cockroach moment was cool [spoiler]that of them eating the miners, ala the Mummy[/spoiler] The nurses, though... They were definately the biggest disappointment (though i still like them better than the belching nurses in SH4) One of my friends put it this way "What did they do to the nurses! The things that gave me nightmares in the games, reduced to this!" Basically they were berserkers that were set off by light.
That's my take on it. Overall I liked it, but I'm never fond of the revenge themes, and the biblical window dressing is just annoying and does little more than start fights which I don't want to be a part of... So, not my favorite movie of all time, but I liked it... Let's say... *** and 1/2 out of 5.
EDIT - Almost forgot to say, whoever said they made Lisa a villainess was wrong, I think... She's just someone who was "curious" So they took a good character and made her neutral, who was in the wrong place at the wrong time...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evcNPfZlrZs Watch this movie なう。 It's legal, free... And it's more than its premise. It's not saying Fast Food is good food. Just watch it.
Legend of Crying Bronies: Twilight's a Princess