ShiroiHikari wrote: Yeah, Cameron Diaz is annoying
When is Cameron Diaz NOT annoying? I can think of two movies: The Mask (when she was a nobody costarring with Jim Carrey) and Something About Mary.
DrNic wrote:I wanna know what people thought was so bad about the Matrix:Reloaded, it was a good film! Pretty much as good as the first!
o.O
You asked for it, and here it is: "Why Matrix II Sucked" (prepare for a lecture)
*note* I still haven't seen Matrix III, so these remarks have no relation to the 3rd. This is strictly from a filmmakers point of view.
The second movie is COMPLETELY different from the first. And there is a very basic reason for that. Ghost in the Shell didn't have a sequal. And the Wachowski brothers were like "oh crap, we need to actually "write" an original piece based upon a movie that we based upon another....and out came the the sequal to the Matrix.
For those of you who STILL don't know and are clueless, Matrix was based upon Ghost in the Shell. It's not a rumor, it's a fact.
The first half of Reloaded had no development in the story whatsoever. It wasn't until about halfway through and into the freeway chase scene that any sort of new information had been given (starting with the Oracle)
We start out with a couple fight scenes that are purely there just for the sake of having a fight scene. They tried matching the special effects of the first Matrix, and even tried surpassing them. To their dismay, the special effects did NOT live up to that of the original. For the effects, yes, it took a lot of effort to actually do what they did, but the end result was still not pretty. IMO, don't show it if it doesn't look good. It was like they were trying to show off; but due to other movies, I was already sick and NOT impressed by bullet time anymore.
I'm all for fight scenes, HOWEVER, a fight scene MUST have relevance to the story. What was the point of the first? The scene with the thousands of Smiths; I get it that they were trying to point out the fact that Smith can regenerate himself and put up a good match against Neo...but how long WAS that scene? I swear it just dragged on and on.
Moving on:
The love story between Neo and Trinity was just flat out NOT appealing. First off, Carrie Anne Moss is not much to look at, and the sex scene was horrific. Did they actually think that would be stimulating? They tried to back that up by having it take place during the rave, which I thought was not necessary. There are many ways to show Zion celebrating without resulting in a giant orgy.
They overkilled the way they foreshadowed Trinity's fate. The opening was enough with Neo waking up. But they kept on it throughout the movie. When it finally came time to show what actually happens to her, I was sick of it. They beat it into my mind too much "look, something's going to happen to Trinity" *10 minutes later* "Don't forget, something will happen to Trinity"
Speaking of the Carrie Anne Moss,
The way she AND Reeves played their characters were an extreme contrast to that of Matrix. In Reloaded they were very dull and had no emotion.
And also, Lauren Fishburne gave a non convincing speech to the people of Zion. What does this all lead to? Bad directing.
One thing that DID catch my interest, were all the symbols and signs that pointed to Greek mythology, which has always perked my interest.
HOWEVER, the first Matrix was all about Christianity and Neo being a Christ-like figure. And now all of a sudden they switch gears and throw Greek mythology and fantasy in there.
I think that switch was just a little sudden and a little different.
People think that Reloaded was so "smart and had depth". Not really. The only thing that was really said was contradicting to what was established in the first Matrix in a way. If the creator of the Matrix slowed down a bit so the average viewer didn't get lost in his words, they would see that it's not that confusing (as most people were who I talked to) It may be possible that they were purposely trying to confuse people to make it SOUND as if it were an indepth movie.
Reloaded probably could have had a running time of less than an hour and be much better. (You'd still have the bad acting, but oh well) Even though I haven't seen Revolutions, I'd like to bet they could have combined the two into one 'better' movie, if they took out all the unnecessary footage.
In conclusion:
Reloaded was a very hyped up movie that failed to meet the expectations of fans (and the movie industry), with less than pretty graphics, a story that went nowhere, poor acting, and too many pointless fight scenes.
Do not be fooled by this movie simply because it's "The Matrix." Just because the first one was great, does not make the sequal great.
And please don't tell me, "Reloaded is much better once you see Revolutions" A true sequal is also a stand alone movie.