Raiden no Kishi (post: 1218170) wrote:Also, I hope never to hear "Nate" and "prance" in the same sentence again . . .
Locke wrote:Not one nerd thought of Iron Man when you saw it?
That is more similar to what BM originally looked like on th box art of the original.
It could still be fun, but it's not Bomberman.
It would be akin to "reinventing" Mario much like Hudson Soft did to Bomberman. Could be fun, but not Mario.
Not one nerd thought of Iron Man when you saw it?
Kanerou wrote:waits for someone to re-invent Kirby
Are you referring to the Kirby one or the Bubble Bobble one?
Because that Bubble Bobble one was hilariously disturbing.
That's not Bomberman that's Iron Man meets Samus Aran meets bombs exploding. It's proof that satan exists.
blkmage wrote:It could still be fun, but it's not Bomberman.
It would be akin to "reinventing" Mario much like Hudson Soft did to Bomberman. Could be fun, but not Mario.
Bobtheduck wrote:Then there was Mario 64, which eliminated some important parts of Mario's mechanics (fire flowers and super mushrooms) and that gets carried further and further every time a new mario is released, it seems...
Return to Video Games and VG Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests