Postby Technomancer » Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:48 am
Bobtheduck wrote:That's how I feel about a LOT of current scientific research... People are more likely to find things that "prove" what they allready believe, and much less likely to look for opposing data... I believe that while there is much more complexity to the issue, it has something to do with the "Bandwagon" and the "Bandwagon of Jumping off the Bandwagon" I have seen a pattern of.
I'd have to disagree with that, since this isn't how science operates. It's falsification that counts. This means that one needs to seek tests that, depending on the outcome, could prove the theory wrong.
Anyways, I haven't read the DaVinci code, but it's premise of Jesus having a child by Mary Magdelene isn't all that new. As far as I know the story was originally spread by the Merovingian kings, who claimed descent through this bloodline. I am not aware of any earlier versions of the story. Incidentally, the story was also the focus of the computer game "Gabriel Knight III"
I'm also reading "The Masks of God: Occidental Mythology" by Joseph Campbell.
The scientific method," Thomas Henry Huxley once wrote, "is nothing but the normal working of the human mind." That is to say, when the mind is working; that is to say further, when it is engaged in corrrecting its mistakes. Taking this point of view, we may conclude that science is not physics, biology, or chemistry—is not even a "subject"—but a moral imperative drawn from a larger narrative whose purpose is to give perspective, balance, and humility to learning.
Neil Postman
(The End of Education)
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge
Isaac Aasimov