Compare Graphics 56k warning

Have a video game or or VG review? This is the place to to discuss it! We also accept discussions of board games and the like, but SHHH! Don't tell anyone, OK?

Compare Graphics 56k warning

Postby truthgone12 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 8:51 am

This started because in the modern gaming thread someone compared halo 2 graphics to MGS3 graphics. Image
They used this picture.

Image
And this picture.

It's time to show 'em wrong. Image
Image
Yes mgs3 is clearly superior.
User avatar
truthgone12
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:44 am

Postby Locke » Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:34 am

So....what does this accomplish?
Secret Bumping Club Member #10 - geocities.com/arphage/sbc.html

When you find yourself in the company of a halfling and an ill-tempered
Dragon, remember, you do not have to outrun the Dragon...
...you just have to outrun the halfling.
User avatar
Locke
 
Posts: 3691
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:00 am
Location: SoCal

Postby Cognitive Gear » Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:40 am

Um.... I'm really wondering what this accomplishes. I mean, xbox has better hardware than PS2, so why should thi suprise anyone, and why should anyone argue?

An d why are they even comparing MGS to Halo? They aren't even remotely similar except in the fact that both characters use guns.....
[font="Tahoma"][SIZE="2"]"It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things."

-Terry Pratchett[/SIZE][/font]
User avatar
Cognitive Gear
 
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:00 am

Postby Locke » Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:43 am

ikimasu wrote:Um.... I'm really wondering what this accomplishes. I mean, xbox has better hardware than PS2, so why should thi suprise anyone, and why should anyone argue?

An d why are they even comparing MGS to Halo? They aren't even remotely similar except in the fact that both characters use guns.....

Console fanboys going at it?
Secret Bumping Club Member #10 - geocities.com/arphage/sbc.html

When you find yourself in the company of a halfling and an ill-tempered
Dragon, remember, you do not have to outrun the Dragon...
...you just have to outrun the halfling.
User avatar
Locke
 
Posts: 3691
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:00 am
Location: SoCal

Postby truthgone12 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:57 am

In the modern gaming forum this person said that mgs3 graphics where better than halo and he used a bad picture of halo and a normal picture of mgs3 to prove it. I'am just showing that he's wrong. I could of just compared the specs but I thought a picture says a thousand words.
User avatar
truthgone12
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:44 am

Postby Mr. SmartyPants » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:14 am

the second halo picture isn't in-game shots... its like a picture of a cinematic or something...

and cinematics are usually always better than ingame shots...
User avatar
Mr. SmartyPants
 
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:00 am

Postby Locke » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:14 am

Mr. SmartyPants wrote:the second halo picture isn't in-game shots... its like a picture of a cinematic or something...

and cinematics are usually always better than ingame shots...

Nope Ryan, thats ingame >.>
Secret Bumping Club Member #10 - geocities.com/arphage/sbc.html

When you find yourself in the company of a halfling and an ill-tempered
Dragon, remember, you do not have to outrun the Dragon...
...you just have to outrun the halfling.
User avatar
Locke
 
Posts: 3691
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:00 am
Location: SoCal

Postby truthgone12 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:18 am

Yup all halo cinematics are in-game. Though that isn't a cinematic.
User avatar
truthgone12
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:44 am

Postby Myoti » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:41 am

Uh, you just seem desperate to disprove everyone, don't you Truthgone12? O_o

And I agree with Ikimasu's statement.
Image
User avatar
Myoti
 
Posts: 2888
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: SECRET WEBSITE

Postby truthgone12 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:45 am

No, I just think that he shouldn't have said that mgs3 had better graphics then halo.
User avatar
truthgone12
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:44 am

Postby Myoti » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:04 pm

No, I just think that he shouldn't have said that mgs3 had better graphics then halo.

And when exactly was that said? The pics were used to show that their wasn't that much difference between them (which, in all honesty, there's not), not that MGS3 had better graphics.
Image
User avatar
Myoti
 
Posts: 2888
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: SECRET WEBSITE

Postby Mr. SmartyPants » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:18 pm

Locke wrote:Nope Ryan, thats ingame >.>


well yeah but not real-time playing....

it's a 3rd person view... that shot seems like its purposefully trying to show off its graphics, one of the "better looking moments" of the game
User avatar
Mr. SmartyPants
 
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:00 am

Postby truthgone12 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:29 pm

Let me show you a quote

Because the graphics are clearly inferior.
Image
Image
Because the graphics are clearly inferior.
User avatar
truthgone12
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:44 am

Postby Bobtheduck » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:35 pm

If you are arguing specs, there is no argument. X-box is the best one. There is no argument there, because the specs are numbers and easily and objectively (for the most part) comparable...

If you're talking about skill in design, I think that the human characters in MGS3 look better than the ones in Halo. Master chief is a monumental achievement in underwhelming, and the other characters are just so-so.

Then there is the environments. Environments are generally easier to do than humans, so it does tend to have more to do with the power of the system in most cases. That being the case, MGS3 does suffer from a lower ability graphics card. Halo's environments are crisper.

Of course, at least part of the environment has to do with skill in design, but the Halo people were skilled at that. For its purpose, it was entirely appropriate (though I prefer organic environments to the spaceship thing that was in the first shot.) I also thought the environments in MGS3 was entirely appropriate.

What I found to be better in MGS3 was a visual relay of emotion. Of course, Halo made no play at being a cinematic game, despite the cut scenes. It is a shooter. That makes it forgiveable because they don't need that level of emotion to fulfill the purpose of that game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evcNPfZlrZs Watch this movie なう。 It's legal, free... And it's more than its premise. It's not saying Fast Food is good food. Just watch it.
Legend of Crying Bronies: Twilight's a Princess
Image
User avatar
Bobtheduck
 
Posts: 5867
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 9:00 am
Location: Japan, currently. Gonna be Idaho, soon.

Postby Myoti » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:42 pm

Truthgone12, that was posted by someone making a point that there is not much difference in the graphics. Yes, as Bob said, the XBOX is graphically stronger, but the actual skill in design goes more to the other side.
Image
User avatar
Myoti
 
Posts: 2888
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: SECRET WEBSITE

Postby truthgone12 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 2:15 pm

Halo has skill in design too. Thought it does have the factor of being a pretty boring game. Except on multiplayer.
User avatar
truthgone12
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:44 am

Postby Yojimbo » Sun Sep 25, 2005 3:43 pm

Boring game? Right well I guess Virtual Backgammon is more your idea of excitement then.

Sarcasm there just like whoever it was that made the original post with those shots was trying to say. It might of been blkmage, cbwing0, or maybe someone else can't remember. Xbox has more raw power than PS2 it's just a fact. But whoever it was that made that post was trying to say that there really isn't *that* much of a difference in quality to to warrant fanboys to say "omgoshorzz lookey at the l33t grafix of (PS2) (Xbox) and how they pwn everything else!!!" And I think there was a Twilight Princess shot in there too.
"You can't sit on the fence when it comes to Jesus, Satan owns the fence." Mark Cahill

2-151 D Co. Infantry (Air Assault)
User avatar
Yojimbo
 
Posts: 2695
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:59 pm
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana

Postby truthgone12 » Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:57 pm

I'am happy with halo 2. I mean it gets repetitive sometimes in the single player.
User avatar
truthgone12
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:44 am

Postby blkmage » Sun Sep 25, 2005 5:25 pm

I posted that, and
And when exactly was that said? The pics were used to show that their wasn't that much difference between them (which, in all honesty, there's not), not that MGS3 had better graphics.

that was what I was trying to say.
User avatar
blkmage
 
Posts: 4529
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:40 pm

Postby truthgone12 » Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:00 am

Now to show the real meaning of this thread. Far Cry and Half-Life 2 are coming to the xbox. I want to compare the graphics of the PC to the Xbox version.
User avatar
truthgone12
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:44 am

Postby Zilch » Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:35 am

truthgone12 wrote: Halo has skill in design too. Thought it does have the factor of being a pretty boring game. Except on multiplayer.


You know, a much less mature side of me wants to flame you for that. But I won't. Cuz I'm a good little boy scout.

MGS3's graphics are an achievement because they pull some of the best out of the PS2's limited hardware. I hadn't seen particle effects like that since Killzone(another game that made the most of the hardware given). But, in my opinion, Halo 2 blows MGS out of the water in two areas: one: Halo 2 is bump/normal mapped (I can't remember which), adding a lighting realism that MGS3 can't compare to. Two: whilst MGS3 has much better character design, most of the characters in it are basically emotionless, unless you have a gun going from head to crotch, but that's another story. In Halo 2, what most of the characters lack in individuality, they make up for in sheer expression, which adds to the immersino of the game.

But hey, this is just my opinion on two excellent games that I would play either way. They both rule. So there. No one can argue that...okay, so maybe they could...but, oh, well...
Uh-oh! Your sig have started to move! -- MOES.

Image

I suppose you could find females attracted to you if you stop being bad at flirting. -MSP
User avatar
Zilch
 
Posts: 1539
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 4:00 am
Location: haha im n ur bse kllin ur d00ds

Postby Mr. SmartyPants » Sat Oct 01, 2005 10:42 am

Play some half-life 2...
User avatar
Mr. SmartyPants
 
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:00 am

Postby Mithrandir » Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:00 am

Out of curiosity, is there any reason you opted to post this on CAA and not on the forum in question? If you have something to contribute to the conversation, do it over there. No one here is going to argue with you about it.

Thought I'll admit I may just be anoyed that these graphics are taking up usable bandwidth and server space.
User avatar
Mithrandir
 
Posts: 11071
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: You will be baked. And then there will be cake.

Postby Sonic_13 » Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:59 pm

I say who the heck cares about graphics. Most insanely fun games dont have all that wonderful graphics (see katamari damacy)
Not trying to start a new suhssuhsuhsss sensation
I'm just talking 'bout my jejejeh generation!
User avatar
Sonic_13
 
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:06 pm
Location: Maine

Postby Yojimbo » Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:29 pm

truthgone12 wrote:Now to show the real meaning of this thread. Far Cry and Half-Life 2 are coming to the xbox. I want to compare the graphics of the PC to the Xbox version.


That depends entirely on what kind of PC you're running them on. If you're running those on say a GeForce 7800 GTX, with 2 Gigs of RAM, and a Athlon FX it's gonna blow it out of the water.
"You can't sit on the fence when it comes to Jesus, Satan owns the fence." Mark Cahill

2-151 D Co. Infantry (Air Assault)
User avatar
Yojimbo
 
Posts: 2695
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:59 pm
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana

Postby Hitokiri » Wed Oct 05, 2005 7:33 am

Sonic_13 wrote:I say who the heck cares about graphics. Most insanely fun games dont have all that wonderful graphics (see katamari damacy)


Here here

I am still playing Sim City 2000 and having much more fun time playing this then I ever did playing Halo or any of those new games coming out.
User avatar
Hitokiri
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Yatsushiro-shi, Kumamoto-ken

Postby blkmage » Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:11 pm

I propose Namco makes a super-realistic Katamari Damacy. That would be the greatest thing ever and at the same time instill in us a fear of katamaris and pray that they will never, ever be invented.
User avatar
blkmage
 
Posts: 4529
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:40 pm

Postby Sync » Wed Oct 05, 2005 5:52 pm

truthgone12 wrote:Now to show the real meaning of this thread. Far Cry and Half-Life 2 are coming to the xbox. I want to compare the graphics of the PC to the Xbox version.

"daytime ravenholm" is all that needs to be said about the Xbox version of HL2.
User avatar
Sync
 
Posts: 558
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 7:05 pm

Postby Slater » Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:33 pm

lol

Are we console-warring here?
Image
User avatar
Slater
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:00 am
Location: Pacifica, Caliphornia

Postby Mr. SmartyPants » Thu Oct 06, 2005 7:58 pm

Sync wrote:"daytime ravenholm" is all that needs to be said about the Xbox version of HL2.


no point of ravenholm when its all bright and shiny XD
User avatar
Mr. SmartyPants
 
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:00 am

Next

Return to Video Games and VG Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests