ikimasu wrote:Um.... I'm really wondering what this accomplishes. I mean, xbox has better hardware than PS2, so why should thi suprise anyone, and why should anyone argue?
An d why are they even comparing MGS to Halo? They aren't even remotely similar except in the fact that both characters use guns.....
Mr. SmartyPants wrote:the second halo picture isn't in-game shots... its like a picture of a cinematic or something...
and cinematics are usually always better than ingame shots...
No, I just think that he shouldn't have said that mgs3 had better graphics then halo.
Locke wrote:Nope Ryan, thats ingame >.>
Because the graphics are clearly inferior.
Because the graphics are clearly inferior.
truthgone12 wrote: Halo has skill in design too. Thought it does have the factor of being a pretty boring game. Except on multiplayer.
truthgone12 wrote:Now to show the real meaning of this thread. Far Cry and Half-Life 2 are coming to the xbox. I want to compare the graphics of the PC to the Xbox version.
Sonic_13 wrote:I say who the heck cares about graphics. Most insanely fun games dont have all that wonderful graphics (see katamari damacy)
truthgone12 wrote:Now to show the real meaning of this thread. Far Cry and Half-Life 2 are coming to the xbox. I want to compare the graphics of the PC to the Xbox version.
Sync wrote:"daytime ravenholm" is all that needs to be said about the Xbox version of HL2.
Return to Video Games and VG Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests