cracky wrote:So fa, no mane has ever reached the 120 year mark.
Cracky wrote:What I think is, in many ancient cultures, people did not keep numerical records of how old people lived. For people in old age, it was probally easy to lose track of their age (In russia. after the commnists took power, some elderly people claimed to be 150 or older since their society did'nt require them to keep records of age before, and they lost count)
Do realize that translations loose A LOT of hidden meaning. Reading between the lines becomes very difficult when a book isn't read in it's original language.
You have any sources for that for the perpetual research-hunter-seeker in me?Technomancer wrote:However, your point about Abraham is well taken. There was also a tendency to exaggerate ages in the ancient near east. In the case of the Mesopotamians however, the ages were much larger.
GhostontheNet wrote:You have any sources for that for the perpetual research-hunter-seeker in me?
Nothing in the above site documents that they wouldn't have taken these numbers literally though, though I will admit to knowing people who say they are a gazillion years old. :eyewink:Technomancer wrote:You could look in:
http://cura.free.fr/11kings.html
Most books on ancient Mesopotamia should also mention this.
Even if you knew the literal Hebrew you wouldn't be as able to read it literarily in the way an ancient Jew would - on my return I'll explain what all this about "such and such in the Ancient Near East" means to those who use these sorts of arguments if necessary.mitsuki lover wrote:I wonder if anyone here who knows Hebrew could tell us what the literal meaning
of the Hebrew is.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests