Orange Kitten wrote:War of the Worlds
are not overrated, they just sucked. Critics ripped these movies apart. Unless you have friends that rave about these movies, I don't know how someone can think of these as being overrated.
Impact Alberto wrote:Actually, I like all of those movies, and don't think any of them are overrated. Just trying to prove the point that if a movie is popular or considered good, it will be considered overrated.
bigsleepj wrote:One movie that SHOULD have been better was Sergio Leone's "Once upon a Time in the West" I loved his "Fistful of Dollars" trilogy but "OUATITW" is considered to be his best western. Unfortunately its not the case. I have nothing against slow paced or long movies, but the movie's plot cant support a 165 minute movie. In the end the movie feels stretched out and quite frankly contrived. Leone builds up to the gun battle between Henry Fonda and Charles Bronson which is the climax of the movie. The gun battle, contained within itself, without the two hours going before it, is handled masterfully and is well constructed visually, but it feels tacky when seen in the movie itself. This is what makes this movie so infuriating! It is ALMOST the masterpiece people claim it is - but it falls short in the last chapters into a mess. There are many scenes contained within themselves that are obviously the work of a film genius - but a movie that is almost a masterpiece is worse than a movie that is average or just bad.
Scribs wrote:Kung pow, enter the fist.
Return to General Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests