[spoiler=" my reply for my post concerning algus"]
If my post is going to be spoilerized, at least spoilerize the spoiler please.
The only spoiler that I'm aware of saying, was *gasp*... that Algus was a villain. Calling him a traitor and a wretch, is merely underlining my dislike for the black hearted so and so. (Oh look, I did it again. Does that count as a spoiler as well?)
Also, it really shouldn't have been a big surprise to learn that he died, if you already knew that he was a villain. MOST VILLAIN'S IN RPG'S DIE! It really shouldn't have been that big of a surprise...
The reason why I didn't spoilerize my post, was because (to me) it seemed a little absurd to spoilerize the name of the villain you're talking about, in a thread talking about villain's.
What (imo) would have been a justifiable cause to spoilerize my post, would be if I went into the exact extent of algus's treachery. (Which I did not.)
I have no problem with UC editing my post. I'm merely displaying my confusion as to why the less significant part was spoilerized, while the more significant (but still incredibly minor) part was left untouched.
Anyone who has played fft will know, that The event that I referred to was only a minor event in the tale. It happened only 1/4'th of the way through the story, you only knew algus for roughly 1/8'th of the story, and algus was an npc. Npc's haven't been known for their loyalty anyway... What made algus a 'true' villain, was because of the extent of his treachery. Which I didn't point out anyway for fear of spoilers, even though my effort was apparently in vain
For the record, I'm not in the least bit angry with anyone here, I'm simply in slight disagreement over what constitutes a 'major spoiler', and felt the need to express my opinion.[/spoiler] If UC, or another Mod thinks that I'm out of line, they can delete this if they like.