For those of you who still play WC III on battle.net...

[Mr_Anderson]

i've started playing WC III again, and i noticed that the teams aren't really even. it seems that all the high level guys are on one team, even tho b.net is supposed to equal out the teams. has anyone else noticed that?

[Tommy]

Is that Warcraft 3 you`re talking about?

if so, is there such thing as War Craft I an II? I`ve only seen wc3 and wc3:frozen throne. Is that an expantion pack or sequel?

[Mr_Anderson]

yeah, warcraft: orcs and humans was the first one, then warcraft II, then warcraft III

[Mr. SmartyPants]

WC II was so.... weird

and if i recall, WC I was for the DOS

[Tommy]

DoS? What`s that?

[Locke]

DoS? What`s that?

One of the first (and possibly best) OS's ( Operating Systems, like XP and Mac).

and I didnt know there was WC for DOS. I was too busy with Duke Nukem.

[Tommy]

Duke Nukem. that title is familiar to me.

[Kanrad]

Duke Nukem was another cheap id game.

Yes, WarCraft: Orcs and Humans was Blizzard's first answer to Westwood's Command and Conquer. It retained a lot more of the Dune 2 style strategies than C&C.

Then came WarCraft 2: Tides of Darkness. It had everything the original WarCraft game did, and came out sooner than Westwood's next game, Red Alert. It was the first game where you could click on the units several times in succession to get a humorous response.