Xeno wrote:1. Is getting her to go to the bible study a pretense to get into her pants?
2a. If you answered yes to question one, do not call her.
2b. If you answered no to question one, then call her, tell her who you are in case she doesn't have your number anymore (some of us purge numbers from our contact list every so often if people don't talk to us), and just invite her to the bible study.
3. Assuming 2b is what happens, other conversation may happen, but do not force it.
dothackzero wrote:Still, It's hard to talk to a girl on the phone. Talking on the phone makes me so freaking nervous.
dothackzero wrote:I swear, why does it seem like every girl I'm interested in is already taken. Really, this is become a bigger problem for me than know what to say now...
dothackzero wrote:I don't want to live life alone.
K. Ayato wrote:Your life verse obviously is "It is not good for man to be alone". Talk about taking something out of context. Maybe you should take a good look at 1 Corinthians 6 and 7 and how Paul shares there can be benefits to NOT being married or in a relationship.
Vilo159 wrote:dothackzero wrote:I don't want to live life alone.
You have plenty of time,. there's no need to worry so much about it.
@Xeno: I'd say that the desire to be in a relationship for the sake of having a significant other, not for sexual satisfaction, is a legitimate desire, it's ok for him to feel that way.
@K. Ayato: You're using those out of context too, though, because Paul was talking about those people serving full-time as missionaries/evangelists. At least that's my understanding of it; maybe that came from something in the JST, I'll have to check.
Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary wrote:7:25-35 Considering the distress of those times, the unmarried state was best. Notwithstanding, the apostle does not condemn marriage. How opposite are those to the apostle Paul who forbid many to marry, and entangle them with vows to remain single, whether they ought to do so or not! He exhorts all Christians to holy indifference toward the world. As to relations; they must not set their hearts on the comforts of the state. As to afflictions; they must not indulge the sorrow of the world: even in sorrow the heart may be joyful. As to worldly enjoyments; here is not their rest. As to worldly employment; those that prosper in trade, and increase in wealth, should hold their possessions as though they held them not. As to all worldly concerns; they must keep the world out of their hearts, that they may not abuse it when they have it in their hands. All worldly things are show; nothing solid. All will be quickly gone. Wise concern about worldly interests is a duty; but to be full of care, to have anxious and perplexing care, is a sin. By this maxim the apostle solves the case whether it were advisable to marry. That condition of life is best for every man, which is best for his soul, and keeps him most clear of the cares and snares of the world. Let us reflect on the advantages and snares of our own condition in life; that we may improve the one, and escape as far as possible all injury from the other. And whatever cares press upon the mind, let time still be kept for the things of the Lord.
Xeno wrote:I'm not saying that is not a legitimate desire. What is unacceptable is that he has allowed it to define and consume his life. This is all that he is. This is all that he cares about. He posts about nothing but his failures with the opposite gender. The consumption of one's life by the drive to obtain a partner is not based on wanting to have an equal life with each other, and it certainly is not based on mutual respect. That forms out of an actual relationship forming between two people. The controlling nature of his desire has caused this to move from something legitimate to something that is illegitimate and unwarranted.
@K. Ayato: You're using those out of context too, though, because Paul was talking about those people serving full-time as missionaries/evangelists. At least that's my understanding of it; maybe that came from something in the JST, I'll have to check.Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary wrote:7:25-35 Considering the distress of those times, the unmarried state was best. Notwithstanding, the apostle does not condemn marriage. How opposite are those to the apostle Paul who forbid many to marry, and entangle them with vows to remain single, whether they ought to do so or not! He exhorts all Christians to holy indifference toward the world. As to relations; they must not set their hearts on the comforts of the state. As to afflictions; they must not indulge the sorrow of the world: even in sorrow the heart may be joyful. As to worldly enjoyments; here is not their rest. As to worldly employment; those that prosper in trade, and increase in wealth, should hold their possessions as though they held them not. As to all worldly concerns; they must keep the world out of their hearts, that they may not abuse it when they have it in their hands. All worldly things are show; nothing solid. All will be quickly gone. Wise concern about worldly interests is a duty; but to be full of care, to have anxious and perplexing care, is a sin. By this maxim the apostle solves the case whether it were advisable to marry. That condition of life is best for every man, which is best for his soul, and keeps him most clear of the cares and snares of the world. Let us reflect on the advantages and snares of our own condition in life; that we may improve the one, and escape as far as possible all injury from the other. And whatever cares press upon the mind, let time still be kept for the things of the Lord.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests