Vii (post: 1520768) wrote:Because it's the only one of the two that I really want to see. I've also heard it'd really good.
I've also never heard of Nichijou.
Blessed be the LORD my strength which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight:
My goodness, and my fortress; my high tower, and my deliverer; my shield, and he in whom I trust; who subdueth my people under me.
Blessed be the LORD my strength which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight:
My goodness, and my fortress; my high tower, and my deliverer; my shield, and he in whom I trust; who subdueth my people under me.
Neane (post: 1520980) wrote:<ペ]http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/292/c/6/persona_4_umad__by_mastakonz-d4dbp6s.jpg[/IMG]
It is the best video game based anime ever made.
MangaRocks! (post: 1520991) wrote:
(*EDIT* after seeing what Falx posted right as I was writing: Wow, that's some really eerie timing there! 0_0 And now I feel awkward... :red::red:)
Blessed be the LORD my strength which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight:
My goodness, and my fortress; my high tower, and my deliverer; my shield, and he in whom I trust; who subdueth my people under me.
Falx (post: 1520985) wrote:Also Blkmage, could we make it a rule for future contests that if you haven't seen at least one of the series you can't vote? It probably would have been beaten in a tie breaker round anyway, but it still bothers me.
Neane (post: 1520980) wrote:It is the best video game based anime ever made.
I think it sounds nice in principle, but we have such a low number of voters (I recall seeing less than ten votes total in some of the elimination rounds) that I don't think making it more difficult to vote would be a good idea.blkmage (post: 1521098) wrote:I've thought about doing this probably around the time of the very first match last year, but eventually decided against it mostly because I thought it'd be too much work to try and enforce.
I'm not particularly against imposing a rule like this, although I'd like to hear some feedback from everyone about how they feel about requirements like this (watched one of the shows, all of the shows, etc.).
Oh, I agree-- and, as I mentioned, in that situation I would normally just not vote. However, for multiple reasons (reading and enjoying the source material, the apparent faithfulness of the movie to that material, and many trusted reviews) I'm pretty certain that I want to vote for it in this case.Falx (post: 1521017) wrote:My only problem is that it sort of makes the whole idea of a contest meaningless, especially if said contest's agenda is to choose which show was superior, if people can vote without having seen the things they're supposed to be judging and critiquing. It's like giving "Al's Steakhouse" 5 stars and "Le Snob Cuisine" 1, without having eaten at either. Even if the truth is that Al is just super good at steaks and Chef Pierre hacks a loogie into every plate of escargot, how would you even know?
As long as it's just having to have seen one of the two shows in a match in these later rounds, I don't think that would be much of a problem. (And hopefully by then I'll have worked out some better timing with the library... )blkmage (post: 1521098) wrote:I'm not particularly against imposing a rule like this, although I'd like to hear some feedback from everyone about how they feel about requirements like this (watched one of the shows, all of the shows, etc.).
blkmage (post: 1521100) wrote:Sure, that sounds impressive, but it's a hilariously low bar if you sit back and think about it.
[s]Macross Frontier: Sayonara no Tsubasa: 1-0-2 (3/10)[/s]
Falx (post: 1520985) wrote:Also Blkmage, could we make it a rule for future contests that if you haven't seen at least one of the series you can't vote? It probably would have been beaten in a tie breaker round anyway, but it still bothers me.
Falx (post: 1520792) wrote:You know, most people here who haven't seen either of the series usually abstain.
Return to Anime and Anime Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 165 guests