rocklobster (post: 1486732) wrote:For me, it's Akira. I've enjoyed all the other Otomo movies, but I can't really say the same forAkira.
Even Steamboy? That movie could put me to sleep.
rocklobster (post: 1486732) wrote:For me, it's Akira. I've enjoyed all the other Otomo movies, but I can't really say the same forAkira.
Cognitive Gear (post: 1486723) wrote:
Yuki-Anne (post: 1486788) wrote:Oh. Right. I just remembered...
THE SOCIAL NETWORK. Andrew Garfield aside, I did not think this movie warranted all the accolades it has received. Granted, I did watch it on a trans-Pacific flight, so my opinion may be colored by the irritation and exhaustion of that experience. Maybe I'd like it better on a second viewing. Who knows? All I know is, it did not upon a first viewing strike me as the magnificent cinematic work that everyone seems to think it is.
Cognitive Gear (post: 1486048) wrote:Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill. I just don't "get" Tarantino, I guess. His movies usually have one scene that is really great, surrounded by a bunch of things that fail to interest me. I honestly haven't taken the time to figure out why, but perhaps I should.
Yuki-Anne (post: 1486788) wrote:THE SOCIAL NETWORK. Andrew Garfield aside, I did not think this movie warranted all the accolades it has received. Granted, I did watch it on a trans-Pacific flight, so my opinion may be colored by the irritation and exhaustion of that experience. Maybe I'd like it better on a second viewing. Who knows? All I know is, it did not upon a first viewing strike me as the magnificent cinematic work that everyone seems to think it is.
Oh yeah, Steamboy was terrible.
I kept on waiting for something truly epic to happen, but no just a giant steam castle.
Mr. Hat'n'Clogs (post: 1486863) wrote:Maybe I'm weird or something but I kind of liked Steamboy >.>
Shao Feng-Li (post: 1486856) wrote:Wouldn't The Social Network been more appropriate as like, an hour long TV documentary thing? Facebook isn't so big a deal to me that I want to watch an actual movie about it...
Tarnish (post: 1487043) wrote:Also seconding 2001. Not that it's bad, really. It makes great background noise, it's beautiful to look at, and it's well written. But anyone who says it isn't boring as all get out is a liar.
Also seconding 2001. Not that it's bad, really. It makes great background noise, it's beautiful to look at, and it's well written. But anyone who says it isn't boring as all get out is a liar.
Scarecrow (post: 1486907) wrote:OH! and any think by that guy who did stuff like Ponyo and Princess Mononoke and all those movies. I've watched just about all of his stuff (his name escapes me at the moment...) but he is the most overrated director with the most overrated movies. I don't understand the appeal but anyway.
Tarnish (post: 1487100) wrote:I didn't say anything about the pacing. The slow pace of the film is part of what gives it a unique atmosphere, and I certainly wouldn't have it any other way.
But it's still boring. I'm glad I watched it once, and I think it's a very important movie, but if I had to watch it again I'd probably try to gnaw my arm off.
Fish and Chips (post: 1487145) wrote:There are two kinds of people in this world:
1. People who think V for Vendetta was a good movie.
2. People who understood V for Vendetta.
I belong with the other guys.
Yamamaya (post: 1487177) wrote:You need to add some qualifiers to this. By understanding V for Vendetta, are you talking about the graphic novel or the movie? I'm assuming you mean the graphic novel.
I'm more of the opinion that the film and the graphic novel have to be viewed as separate works.
GrubbTheFragger wrote:No tarentino love I loves me some Pulp Fiction and Resevour Dogs was good.
Return to General Entertainment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 291 guests