TheSubtleDoctor (post: 1391293) wrote:Off the top of my head, I'd whittle down the number of our licenses to maybe half a dozen TV shows and one full length feature film per year and put the remaining licensing budget into marketing the crap out of those handful of shows or possibly lobbying for a big-seller to go onto Adult Swim (and maybe making some quality pieces of merch).
rocklobster (post: 1391377) wrote:What I want to say here is that in order to save the R1 industry, we will need to overcome this obstacle. As long as animation is seen as childish, anime will always be a hard sell.
Blitzkrieg1701 (post: 1391420) wrote:First and foremost, I'd team up with a Japanese company. I don't just mean have a close relationship with the company I was licensing things from, I mean BE that company. The Japanese and American groups would be two parts of the same entity, and the material that entity produced would be Japan/US co-productions. This would solve a LOT of problems for all parties concerned. The Japanese company would have someone to shoulder the burdens of production, a guaranteed US release, and a way to bypass the increasingly bad local market. The deal's even better for the R1 market: there's no bidding war for shows we want, we have creative input in said show, we can produce material that's more easily marketable to US audiences and make sure it actually gets marketed that way, we could make simultaneous worldwide releases possible, AND you can't tell me that dubs would be better with someone who speaks English working on the original writing. I just can't see the current "they make it, we license it" model sustaining itself much longer, I'm not going to try and sell something I had no active role in creating.
So, that's step one: hook up directly with a Japanese studio and start creating new material from scratch. Since that step alone would be a major undertaking, and actually funding a production from scratch would cost a lot more than just licensing a finished work, we'd probably have to creep along with one project at a time for a while. Said projects would be aimed at the sort of audience that doesn't usually watch anime, but could be sucked in if something looked cool enough. In other words, we'd be trying to make the next Cowboy Bebop: something cool mature, and most likely not attached to any pre-existing franchise. So yeah, I'd also avoid doing kiddie stuff, at least until the company was established.
Also, if possible, I'd try to put an emphasis on feature-length productions rather than TV material. Live action TV looks more like the movies every day, but I don't know if anime can really compete on a TV budget and production schedule. Maybe I'd get into TV once the company was established enough to really dump a lot of resources into every episode, but at first I'd probably stick to movies.
First and foremost, I'd team up with a Japanese company. I don't just mean have a close relationship with the company I was licensing things from, I mean BE that company. The Japanese and American groups would be two parts of the same entity, and the material that entity produced would be Japan/US co-productions.
The problem here is the assumption that you won't get forced with awful licenses as part of a package with a very enticing license. What is your plan to deal with the Kiss x Sis equivalent that you might end up with to get your FMA-equivalent?
First of all, for North American audiences, movies are unsustainable. In that light, why would a Japanese company want to fund a movie for distribution in North America when the North American portion will likely lose money? Also, anime movies in Japan typically run on a very limited number of screens, which is why they make so much money compared to TV shows.
ShiroiHikari (post: 1391497) wrote:For the record, I do not think that making anime have more "Western" appeal is the answer to the R1 industry's problems. If it was Western, it wouldn't be anime-- if you get my drift. There's nothing wrong with Western tastes-- and perhaps I'm alone in this --but I like anime because it isn't Western.
blkmage wrote:Actually, thinking about this model more, it might be a good idea to license one or two shows per season that you are fairly confident will do well.
The problem here is the assumption that you won't get forced with awful licenses as part of a package with a very enticing license. What is your plan to deal with the Kiss x Sis equivalent that you might end up with to get your FMA-equivalent?
I wonder if it would be reasonable to accept those package deals and really push for the hits and not even bother with a DVD release for the crap...
For the record, I do not think that making anime have more "Western" appeal is the answer to the R1 industry's problems. If it was Western, it wouldn't be anime-- if you get my drift. There's nothing wrong with Western tastes-- and perhaps I'm alone in this --but I like anime because it isn't Western.
Even if a company did try to make the next Cowboy Bebop, would it succeed? Rather than trying to make the "next big thing", they should just concentrate on making good, solid shows. Japan has been dropping the ball a bit on that, if you ask me, but then, so has the US.
MasterDias (post: 1391511) wrote:I'm pretty sure there are contract stipulations that force them to release the shows on physical media.
blkmage (post: 1391514) wrote:
Also, Funimation willingly took Dance in the Vampire Bund? LOLOLOLOLOL
rocklobster (post: 1391518) wrote:It's Twilight's popularity. It has to be.
rocklobster (post: 1391518) wrote:It's Twilight's popularity. It has to be.
MasterDias (post: 1391648) wrote:Bizarrely, it appears the Japanese license holders made Funimation think it was actually worse than it was. Although, they could have taken note that the DitVB manga has been released here unedited, and Funi themselves have released worse stuff(RIN...)
Funimation backpedaled pretty quickly though and it now appears that the DVD release will be uncut anyway...so it's pretty much a moot point. But that whole situation was pretty strange, and just plain poorly handled on a number of levels. Chasing off your niche target audience is always a really bad move.
rocklobster (post: 1391652) wrote:yeah, i heard there was quite a backdraft. Some were even threatening to boycott. Thankfully Marzgurl just said we should just not buy the title to "teach FUNimation a lesson", so to speak.
MasterDias wrote:Funimation backpedaled pretty quickly though and it now appears that the DVD release will be uncut anyway...so it's pretty much a moot point. But that whole situation was pretty strange, and just plain poorly handled on a number of levels. Chasing off your niche target audience is always a really bad move.
" wrote:RustyClaymore 11:27 - Ah yes, Socks is the single raindrop responsible for the flood. XD
rocklobster (post: 1391967) wrote:Here's another idea: Re-licensing! A lot of great titles are being lost to time. Get those old titles so new generations can enjoy them. And yes, people will buy old-school.
KhakiBlueSocks (post: 1391996) wrote:[font="Trebuchet MS"][SIZE="4"][color="RoyalBlue"]2. Push the physical formats in as many places as I possibly can][/SIZE][/font]
Nate (post: 1392072) wrote:Yeah, space is pretty limited at places like Wal-Mart. They aren't like Best Buy, who have a lot of extra shelf space for stuff, Wal-Mart has a fairly small electronics section, and they're not going to stock DVDs of say, Higurashi on their shelf if it isn't a big-seller. That's why the only anime Wal-Mart tends to have is Naruto, Bleach, and Pokemon. They did have Death Note for a while, but the sales of that show are more or less over, and even Bleach is getting hard to find on their shelves these days.
Return to Anime and Anime Reviews
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 386 guests