Eh, the challenge is to complete a novel-length piece of writing in a month, so yes, the word count is important. If the story is your priority, that's fine, but you can't tell people you succeeded if you don't hit 50,000. Really though, a lot of serious minded writers will end up editing their stories down from that, so if you end your story and still have a couple thousand words to go, just do a really long epilogue, or kill of the cast in ridiculously extravagant ways, then after November cut that bit.ChristianKitsune (post: 1353638) wrote:what do you guys think? Does the word count matter so much as the content and the desire to write?
ich1990 wrote:2107 words.
Well that was fairly demoralizing. I had to write for nearly three solid hours to get that far. The perfectionist in me is my own worst enemy, it really kills my writing speed.
goldenspines wrote:Its only stealing if you don't get caught.
uc pseudonym wrote:It might save you time in the long run, though. For some people it is good advice to sit down and finish something, if that is their struggle. But I generally find that it is worth the time to sit and think for as long as it takes to do the scene right.
goldenspines wrote:Its only stealing if you don't get caught.
ich1990 wrote:That is true. I guess it depends on what goal one is aiming for, the 50k words in 30 days or a solid manuscript (for me, they appear to be mutually exclusive goals). I thought I was going for the 50k words, but I can't seem to "write with abandon". Perhaps that will change as I fall behind and the deadline gets closer.
ich1990 wrote:Also, what is your name on NaNoWriMo, UC? I can't seem to find you under your usual tags.
uc pseudonym (post: 1354189) wrote:I need to do some name research, but because I dislike it I am procrastinating. So while the majority of the characters have names from Sanskrit, I have a Bob and a Bill running around. Also a character from Bobland.
I used my other primary tag, sassygurl69.
I have not joined the site. As I recall, they have some nifty progress recorders but not much else, and I would just as soon use a basic word count. Apparently it also has more of a social networking aspect, from how other people are talking about it.
Fish and Chips[/quote wrote:Nearly 12,000 words as of posting, my plot is scrambled heavily (and not in the way I would have preferred), but I've gained leagues of understanding about some of my characters and the world they operate in, particularly a few who originally started as one-note concepts with a names attached. I think one 50,000 word junk novel never to be published is a fair exchange for legitimately interesting characters who can be transferred into more deserving rewrites in the immediate future.
It wasn't a concession I made comfortably at first, but one of the main reasons my novel writing attempts last year crashed and burned so hard was because I tried to maintain rigid perfectionism to both my plot and characters, sacrificing actual writing for editing and deleting mass passages. My steamrolling success this year is probably due entirely to my being more flexible and less officious.ich1990 (post: 1354226) wrote:That is an interesting way to look at it. Perhaps just focusing on the plot or the characters (but not both) and going for 50k would be a solid compromise between the two extremes of quality versus quantity.
goldenspines wrote:Its only stealing if you don't get caught.
Fish and Chips wrote:Character naming conventions are one of my favorite things in fiction. I enjoy naming all my characters (often first, last, and on some rare occasions middle names), though I tend to prefer somewhat extravagant European or foreign sounding names, and sometimes names that aren't really names at all.
ich1990 wrote:My plot was pretty much destroyed when my characters started doing things on their own, and with a daily quota to meet, I can't make them stop acting out.
Well part of it is simply me appealing to the romantic idea that the author doesn't write a novel, the novel writes the author. Having never written a substantial amount of fiction before, I felt the need to try out that cliche.uc pseudonym (post: 1354545) wrote:Would you care to say more about that specifically when you have the opportunity? I have read more than a few authors say similar things and always wondered if it is a difference in writing style, or just a manner of speaking.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests