Ashley (post: 1305610) wrote:Well, I'm a pretty voracious reader, so I'm sure they will. Is there a particular genre you like? I could prowl around in my to-be-posted archives (I have about 30 reviews that just need some polishing) and see if I have one for a book you might like...
Rocklobster wrote:1. Will you only be doing current books or will you do any book regardless of how old it is?
2. Can we suggest a book? I have quite a few that I wish were more well-known.
3. Can we do guest reviews?
Ashley (post: 1305816) wrote:At Ich1990:
You and I have probably read a lot of the same books]The Pilgrim's Regress[/i] soon, and Louis Markos' From Achilles to Christ which you may find particularly interesting.
I do have a science fiction anthology review to be posted; maybe I'll be able to get that done by Monday and post it this week. Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide is on my soon-to-read list, so be on the lookout!
Ashley (post: 1305908) wrote:You know, off the top of my head, I bet you would really enjoy Church History in Plain Language by Bruce L. Shelley--it's a really comprehensive church history book told in very compelling, interesting, and contemporary ways. I enjoyed it a lot and I think you would too.
This looks relevant to my interests, I'll be checking it out. I definitely encourage you to read The Pilgrim's Regress. It is a book that definietely could use more publicity.
Ashley (post: 1330038) wrote:I'm not a huge fan of Agatha Christie (precisely for her formulaic tendencies, as you mentioned).
KhakiBlueSocks wrote:"I'm going to make you a prayer request you can't refuse..." Cue the violins.
ich1990 (post: 1330078) wrote:My only complaint is that it is almost impossible for the reader to solve the mystery before the epilogue (which is better than being able to guess it in the first chapter I suppose). It is a quick read (you could probably read it in an evening or two), it draws you in, and it has historical significance. I would recommend it.
bigsleepj (post: 1330122) wrote:Raymond "author of my name" Chandler criticised Agatha Christie's type-plots, pointing out that they are so meticulously worked out that they are impossible for an educated person to guess (actually, his phrase is "only a half-wit could guess it"). Off course, Chandler was rather particular in his tastes. By contrast George Orwell savoured that type of plot-construction and bemoaned the more "realistic" murders by something as unimaginative as a gun.
I used to love Agatha Christie, but I've somewhat grown ambivalent towards much of her writing. Some I remember fondly while some I do not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests