SirThinks2Much (post: 1243127) wrote:I once posted a blog about something called "gender variant behaviors," which are entirely bull. Basically, if a girl likes horseriding, Lord of the Rings and having small breasts, she's practically a lesbian and a boy who likes the color pink and doing ballet is just about gay. Well, I guess that means I'm a lesbian then, toodaloo! This sort of thinking is a complete fallacy and based on old-fashioned gender roles. Even the Bible wasn't this stringent--Deborah was a judge and Lydia ran her own company. Had nothing to do with who they chose to sleep with.
Vernhal (post: 1243849) wrote:I know you only lightly touched on the male side of this issue because it was addressed to minaki but I agree this is a complete fallacy. I have people who assume I am gay because I love art and theatre etc... it really pisses me off.
People go around going "wow I bet hes gay" or "wow she seems like such a lesbo"
and I always look at them and say "You have no reason to think that besides the fact that they don't fit into natural gender roles so why don't you shuyt your pie trap"
or something along those lines.
"Let me put it this way: If I get married, I want to be the husband. I want to make the household decisions and I want HIM to submit to ME. That doesn't mean that he has to do all the cooking and cleaning necessarily, but I I HAVE to wear the pants in such a relationship. Why? Because I'm a selfish anal control freak. Which probably means that I'll never have this problem."
minakichan wrote:BUT GUYS MOCK ME FOR THIS. I DO NOT COMPREHEND.
At this point, I don't know if I have a sexual abnormality or just hormones or just major PMS, so I don't know how to respond ._.
It won't get rid of your hormones unfortunately, or if they remove the hormone-releasing components you have to take supplements. Trust me, if you don't, things could get really ugly.minakichan wrote:DO WANT. GIMME GIMME.
Well, not quite, it wouldn't solve all the problems, right?
There are many successful relationships and marriages where the woman "wears the pants". A friend of mine's parents have this situation. No offence, but I don't think any relationship where one member, male or female, dominates totally is a very healthy one. It's about mutual respect and submission. I believe decisions have to be made together. Okay, maybe you think I'm being idealistic, but I'm taking about marriage or if the couple are very close to it. To use Corkyspaniel's post:minakichan wrote:Let me put it this way: If I get married, I want to be the husband. I want to make the household decisions and I want HIM to submit to ME. That doesn't mean that he has to do all the cooking and cleaning necessarily, but I I HAVE to wear the pants in such a relationship. Why? Because I'm a selfish anal control freak. Which probably means that I'll never have this problem.
This kind of thing needs to be addressed in a relationship before marriage is considered. Say my partner wants to have 6 kids and I don't want any and we are both set in our ways. I can't marry my partner and expect him to give up his dream for children either. And he can't make me give up my career for 6 children. That's not fair both ways. Either we need to come to a compromise or maybe it would be best not for us to get married. If either of us "dominates" and makes those kinds of life-changing decisions on their own, the marriage is going to get difficult.I mean, if he wants kids, but wants me to give up my life's dreams for him, or something like that, I can't.
Yes, more or less. I think there is some sort of sexual drive that steams from the brain and other elements of body chemistry.minakichan wrote:So it's like intellectually I don't want to have sex, but biologically I do?
Is that why some rape victims still feel pleasure at it? ._.
minakichan wrote:Let me put it this way: If I get married, I want to be the husband. I want to make the household decisions and I want HIM to submit to ME. That doesn't mean that he has to do all the cooking and cleaning necessarily, but I I HAVE to wear the pants in such a relationship. Why? Because I'm a selfish anal control freak. Which probably means that I'll never have this problem.
minakichan wrote:My obsession with pants stems from something like this: obviously, I can't wear the pants with God and there aren't any pants anyway. But God is 923492387898273102019283x awesomer than me, so submitting to him makes sense. Boys are not 923492387898273102019283x awesomer than me, so I don't see why I have to be the sub. I bet I can be at least 1.5x awesomer than my husband if I try, so I want to be the dom. I just don't think it's fair. I think I can make decisions just as well as any other person. I would make a slavery analogy, but I won't.
minakichan wrote:Well, generally I use my mouth to speak...
minakichan wrote:But I feel like the brain differences between women and men are either neutral or lean in men's favor. Aren't men wired to be better at problem-solving and logic? That's not to say that women are going to be worse or that men can't be creative, but I'm just saying that if there are brain differences, women don't luck out as a result.
Sheenar (post: 1244014) wrote:Also, as for submitting to my future husband, I will gladly do so if he is following the command to "love your wife as Christ loved the church" --if he is doing that, then he won't take advantage of his position as head of the family.
But I feel like the brain differences between women and men are either neutral or lean in men's favor. Aren't men wired to be better at problem-solving and logic? That's not to say that women are going to be worse or that men can't be creative, but I'm just saying that if there are brain differences, women don't luck out as a result.
uc pseudonym (post: 1244006) wrote: I think there shouldn't be any pants.
well I think everyone has times in their life where they sturggle with sexual identity. Especially during the teen years when hormones get out of wack and whatnot. I wouldn't worry about seemingly having feelings for both sexes it will probably dissipate.
If you have decided to stay single and die a virgin maybe when thoughts like these enter your head try striking back by thinking about how great it will be to be alone?
People thought I was a lesbian throughout middle school, because I somehow fit the criteria.
Would that humans were all hermaphroditic organisms. That would make this sort of thing so much easier.
However, what happens if several months you get nothing? It helps you call attention to something that might be wrong with you that the rest of the body can't see.
Real life porn is gross. D:
He can see into your innermost thoughts and feelings and not be disgusted by it.
I'd like to add, that because of that chauvinism, China is facing a major Chinese girl shortage.
Man I'm starting to wish I was asexual. I mean I'm going to end up alone anyway so it would just be a whole lot easier if I didn't care about it.
No offence, but I don't think any relationship where one member, male or female, dominates totally is a very healthy one. It's about mutual respect and submission.
Are you describing a problem or a state of being? As someone who is a massive control freak who spends a great deal of energy trying not to be, I think you see my angle.
Isn't Christianity all about submitting yourself to people a lot worse than you? I mean, the very beginning of the religion is God sacrificing for the sake of worthless humanity and then calling us to do the same for each other (who are, obviously, essentially identical compared to God's arbitrarily high awesomeness factor).
So what you're saying is that you don't use your brain when you speak?
My unqualified but vaguely educated opinion is that the differences are fairly minor and overall even
I've just seem too many fall apart around me and/or that type of thing. Where the man does take advantage of his position of the head of the house o.o;
I second this sentiment!
minakichan (post: 1244096) wrote:That's me. I could totally psychoanalyze myself right now and say that all my fears about love and marriage stem from MY CHILDHOOD because I never had good role models for it, and my >< at men's position as head of the household stem from my daddy issues.
Is it really because of gender, or is it because of cultural expectation? Aren't things people labeled girly merely based on the stereotypical views of what is girly in a given culture? Spiritually, male and female are the same.
YOU HAVE US NATEEEEEEEEEEE.
Real women look terrible naked XD;;;
Nate (post: 1244198) wrote:
I think there are laws against me marrying all of you. :p
I disagree with this sentiment!
Sheenar (post: 1244214) wrote:Hey, you'll find somebody, Nate. At least you are fighting your "deviancy" --there are many people who love their sin and stay in it. I think some girl will be attracted by your willingness to keep fighting and to keep trying.
As for Prince Asbel's post, yeah, I'd be marrying for that reason -being that I want to have children--and in order to get those...well, you know. Even if I adopted a child, the child should still have a father in his/her life. Plus, having the companionship and someone to share your life with and to seek God with.
So, yeah, and after all this talk about women and submission--I hate to say this--but I would be perfectly happy being a stay at home mom. Of course I'll work for a while, but if God blesses me with a child, then I will stay at home and be with him/her.
I was a latchkey kid...and I hated coming home to an empty house...I want to be the mother my mother wasn't. But that's just me personally.
SnEptUne (post: 1244220) wrote:People often take bible passage out of context, and this is no exception.
"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.'' (Ephesians 5:22)
But why do they ignore the verse just right before it?
"Submit yourselves one to another in the fear of God,'' (Ephesians 5:21)
Wives are to submit to their husband just has husbands are to submit themselve to their wives. Has bible becomes a political tools to justify submission of women? Yes, it has, especially by taking passages out of context just like how the devil tested Jesus. But that doesn't mean we should blindly follow it without question, as that would tarnish the name of Jesus.
SnEptUne (post: 1244220) wrote:But why do they ignore the verse just right before it?
"Submit yourselves one to another in the fear of God,'' (Ephesians 5:21)
Wives are to submit to their husband just has husbands are to submit themselve to their wives.
NekoChan_C (post: 1244282) wrote:while he was the tyrant. He looked like a strong man, but he was weak and I was moving behind the scenes to keep it all together. THAT kind of man needs a reality check. And Jesus.
NekoChan_C (post: 1244299) wrote:Take heart, because as you said, not all men are like that. And the man that God brings to you in marriage may challenge you in ways, but if his heart is right, he will not seek to dominate or belittle you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 197 guests