The closest HP comes to being like real life are the divination classes (and a bit of astrology). Divination is about the only thing I'm moderatly uncomfortable with, but it's infrequent use and the fact that it's basically looked down upon by most of the other professors in the school (as sort of a "junk science" as it where), I'm not too worried about it (i.e. it's not shown in a overly flattering light).
Astrology on the other hand is in the Narnia series, and in a positive light in Lewis' world. That's not to say that Lewis condones this in real life (and if I remember correctly because of this beliefs he points out in the naration that there is a difference with the stars in that world). A similarity can be seen with the Cenitars in both books, studying the stars to reviel the future.
The real danger (if any) with HP doesn't lie in the books themselves, but in tie-ins by other people and companies jumping on the bandwaggon of sorts and taking anything they can that'll make money (including some items, ideals, and literature that
is bad). This is where we need to make sure we're being light and salt to the world, not by putting down the HP series, but by making sure people know the real dangers, those "other things" that are getting swept up. Encourage Peretti or Lewis books as the next read to people who enjoyed Rowlings works. Make sure that the truth that lives in us shines brighter than the lie that some sell just to make money.
For those who think Rowling is, well, all the things people keep saying, do some research. Google will get you tons info, much of which is credible and will debunk the stuff that goes around in e-mail.
One of the most popular articles to circulate is the "Harry Potter Leads Kids to Satanism" article that the Onion did. The first time (yes, I"ve gotten it more than once) I got this article I spent a good half hour writing a response to it, quoting and pointing out how insane the ideals that where presented (the worse of it was my questioning where the parents where in all this). Then I got to the end quote, something rather rude that I'll not repeat here. It was just out of character of everything I had read (and this was a while ago, many more articles and interviews with her have happened since). I spent even more time researching it, trying to verify the quote that was attributed to a London Times article, yet I could find very little searching for Rowling on there, and much where you're run-of-the-mill news stories.
I took to the internet to try to find more info, putting in "Harry Potter Satanism" into Google go the very article I was reading as the 1st hit, and when I saw that it was on the Onion I knew right away this was a joke. I erased the message, dropped the link to the original article in there and explained to the woman that it was from a Satire News page, and that it was even funnier with the pictures
A quick check with sites like Truthorfiction will tell you the article is bogus and from The Onion. Sadly the article on their own web site has gotten bumped off and can't be found there.
Most of the info you've heard around can be debunked quite quickly, articles from Wiccans who laugh at the idea that the magic in the books is anyway related to what they do or believe, etc.
And while I don't recommend it, I'm sure you'll find very little to support the satanism/HP claims from satanic sites, I've poked a little (I'm glad to know that I'm not totally morally bankrupt, just looking at a satanic forum gives me the creaps!) and I think if you did you'd find quite the opposite (
DO NOT do this though).
Typical info on the subject like
this (<- clicky) can be found with little problems.
Oh, and to wrap this bit of my rant... you'll notice that every time you see someone connect Rowling with these sorts of things, they lack any source references.... in these cases we have to not just ask, but demand to see source references.... just cuz someone says it doesn't make it so (otherwise I'd be rich, buff, and have women falling all over me... beats doing it the hard way
)
One last thing before I turn over the soapbox to someone else for a while, people criticize Rowling's writing style as being simplistic and written for kids, and while that's an issue of opinion and choice (not right or wrong), I personally found that the Narnia series "talked down" to me (didn't stop me from reading it, or enjoying, just a different style). I never felt that way with the HP books, they never addressed me as anything more than a person, never came from a more elevated or older place. Made them easy to read, and I think one of the reasons that kids like them, they don't treat the readers as kids.
I'm not saying that Narnia series isn't any good, or that HP is better, more a case of different styles... Narnia is powerful, done well... there's a reason it's a classic. Much of that has to do with personal preference, and that's ok.
Ok... I've got 6 1/2 more pages of new threads... I should get back to them