CAA: Christian Anime Alliance

I`m sorry, but I know 9/10 people will disagree but my opinion must be heard.

Although, Skateboarding is my favorite kind of gaming, Role Playing is my favorite Genre. I had NEVER played an RPG that I didn`t enjoy, they all rocked my socks and kept me playing till the end. Heck, I didn`t even mind FFX-2, once you get past the Charlie`s Angels scenario. What does Mario have to do with this you ask? You`ll see.

So I`m playing N64 over my friend`s house about 4 years ago and he`s playing "Paper Mario". I found it ok, but every other Mario game I thought was better.

The same friend 4 years later handed me Mario: SuperStar Saga and I have one phrase to describe thatr game IMO:

THE MOST SUCKIEST RPG....No, THE MOST SUCKIEST GAME TO DATE!

It is seriously THE one RPG i`m willing to throw in a dumpster and not care. It`s not just because it`s Mario, It`s because story and Gameplay or the most important RPG elements. What am I doing? I`m saving The princesses` voice. How crappy is the gameplay? VERY!

So I popped in Thousand Year Door in my friend`s Gamecube which was a decent game, but no that best for an RPG. Not just because Mario`s in it, because the whole "Kiddish paper" concept never turned me on. i did hget used to it but they might as well make the villian a flippin` Paper Shredder.

The Best Mario Game in existance is definately Mario: Six Golden Coins for The GB, which was the first appearence of Wario as the villian. It`s games like that that storyline never mattered. That game still rocks as i play it on my GB (Yes, I still have the original Game Boy. It`s sacred).

So people, why do you love Mario RPGs so much?

PS: I Heard a game for the SNES called : "Super Mario RPG" was the only good Mario RPG from my other RPG-lovin` friend. What we need for Sonic and Mario is a 3d sidescroller!!!!!

*puts hand to head in annoyance*
Oh boy. When you said you were starting a Mario RPG thread, I thought you were being positive about it.

Okay, number one. Look at all the Mario RPG games and you should see a running theme, called "humour". None of the games were ever meant to be serious in the first place, and honestly, these are some of the most unique RPGs I've seen in awhile.

Two. What's wrong with the gameplay? I love FF and all, but the "Super Star Saga" style is the funnest style I have ever played. The Mario games always were meant to be about pushing your skills to the limit in new ways, and the timing techniques done in the Mario RPGs follows that example. I have seen way, way too many RPGs focus on a cliched story-line so much that it completely ignores the gameplay. Nintendo has always focused more on the gameplay, which I truly prefer over graphics or storyline.

Now, there's my view on this, and I truly hope you'll again at what you're saying and realize that these games may be alot better than you believe.

Mmm...Mario RPG...Now THAT'S a classic! *needs to find that ROM again, too...* I loved Paper Mario, though (the only thing I didn't like was that you could only have one party member with you at a time, but I suppose that did make sense later on...)! It had fun gameplay, a creative idea, and was just a fun game. I spent many an hour thouroughly enjoying that game. It wasn't kiddy at all, it was just...well, fun. Games don't need to have adult themes to be considered a good game.

I did play Superstar Saga, and while it wasn't Mario at his best, it was still so-so. I think my favorite part in that game was the guy who said things like, "THE MUSTARD IS YOUR DOOOM!!!" or whatever...XD Anyways, you must also keep this in mind: Perhaps not all Mario games are meant for hardcore RPG fans or a more mature audience. I suppose Mario games are some of the very few games that are still suitable for children. So before you get all offended at Mario for being in an RPG, remember that not all games are meant to please everyone. I never played Thousand Year Door, since I was buying FF games at the time, but I'm sure it's not as bad as you say. Mario's not a horrible game, it's just targeted towards a different audience.

And you can't hate Nintendo for trying to bring innovation into their Mario games; if every Mario game was "just another side scroller," game developers and gamers alike would get sick of it. I think it's good that they've made tennis games, party games, golfing games, and RPG's with the Mario series. Call me an optimist, but I think it shows that Mario's developer's creative juices are still intact after almost 20 years. ^_^

As for the best Mario game, I wasn't too impressed with 6 Golden Coins. I still own it because it's practically an antique, but I hate how when you get a game over, you have to get all of the Golden coins all over again...>_< (was in Wario's Castle when this happened...) Personally, I'm going with Mario RPG, Super Mario Bros. 3, or Mario 64. Those games were truly great...*goes off in search of emulators and the ROMS she misses so much..*

Exactly. Anyone who tries to say that Nintendo is losing it apparently has not played a Nintendo game in the past 10 years, including the Mario RPGs.

Yeah, a serious Mario game that would be the day. Mario RPGs fail to be humerous. The humour sucks and my friend`s 6-year-old brother agrees."The Mustard is your doom!" Come on, that`s the lmaest thing i`ve ever heard. The gameplay was really annoying. Mario was just a classic sidescrolling game.

I don`t know how they kept him alive but I haven`t enjoyed a Mario game since Mario 64 or Party. Gee, I can`t wait until Mario Party 12 comes out, oh wat, might as well keep my N64 because they`re ALL THE SAME!

Mario tennise got boring after 2 seconds (All 2 of them)
Mario Golf I never played.

Hm. I believe I disagree. Mario RPG was an enjoyable game, and while it wasn't a hardcore rpg, it had secret bosses, ultimate equipment, a decent combat system and (above all) good gameplay.

As for Paper Mario (I have not played the sequel), I realize it isn't made to be completely serious, nor did I find it particularly funny. But the gameplay was simply so enjoyable that it actually ranks fairly high on my theoretical and insubstantial list of games.

As for SuperStar Saga... what did you particularly dislike about it? I thought it was an interesting take on the rpg genre. Being able to get out of difficult battles by sheer skill was somewhat enjoyable, as was being able to compensate for failures by leveling. While I wouldn't call it a classic, I also don't feel it was a terrible game.

To actually answer your question: while I don't love them "so much" I like the Mario rpgs mainly because they are fun. That's basically the whole of it.

why must you complain? if you don't like something, keep it to yourself... if you want to ask us why we like it... then ask, don't go around saying "ZOMG MARIO SUXXORS" and stuff

not every rpg has bsaically the same style and interface and combat style...

I didn`t complain and I didn`t say "ZOMG MARIO SUXXORS". What the heck is a "SUXXOR"?

I said: " Superstar Saga was the Suckiest Game".

I never commented on Super Mario RPG besides the face I heard it was a good game.

Here my comments:

Super Mario RPG: I heard it was pretty good.
Superstar saga: The Suckiest game to date.
Both Paper Marios: Decent.

This thread is only a negative sence to Superstar Saga and the face they make too much Mario parties. I haven`t bashed Paper in any why besides the face that everything is kiddish and paper which I got over.

So right now, in no negative sence, what was Super Mario RPG like?

You should play Super Mario RPG. It's a collaboration between Square and Nintendo before the dark times. Before the Empire.

Square helped in this porject. No wonder it`s known to be 'the only good mario rpg' from what I`ve heard. only, i dont have any friends that still own an SNES.

[quote]No wonder it`s known to be 'the only good mario rpg' from what I`ve heard.[/QUTOE]
This is just... ugh... why most people create threads simply for bashing?

I didn`t make the thread for Superstar Saga which is the only thing i`m bashing.
Why do we make threads simply for overrating?

You can go ahead and play crappy games with pathetic plots, boring gameplay, and just overally horribleness IMO. No one`s stopping you. -Is Referring to just Superstar Saga-

Well, it's nice to see more Mario optimists out there! Except for you, Jerome...*glares at Tom Dincht while pouring Mountain Dew on her keyboard...Homestar Runner is teh funny*

<-- is joking

Mario RPG was one of my favorite SNES games, along with CT, Seiken Densetsu 3, Earthbound, and Zelda. The music, characters, gameplay, mini-games, sidequests...Even the sound effects bring nostalgia. I loved every minute of that game! It was more like a classic RPG than Paper Mario was, since you had larger amounts of HP and more than one party member in battle. Geno was the coolest character by far, but having Peach and Bowser fight alongside you in battle was also incredibly cool! Man...I loved that game!! And the fact that it was made by Square and Nintendo could be the reason why it was one of the greatest Mario games, in my opinion.

But apparently, you have no appreciation for random humor, because "the mustard is your doom" is one of the most random things I've heard in a Mario game...A video game in general, for that matter...Man, that's just great!! XD I appreciate the Mario games' light-heartedness, even if it isn't side-splitting humor. And hey, don't go insulting the Mario tennis games, I thought those were great. Granted, they had to be played with more than one person to be truly enjoyed (the 64 version, at least), but they were still very entertaining. I guess we can't change your mind, but we can say that Mario is immortal, and 30-something side-scrolling adventures would be a complete snore fest next to the 30-something innovative Mario games.

Oh, and while you didn't say "ZOMG MARIO SUXXORS!!one!1!" you did say that Superstar Saga was the "most suckiest" Mario game, which is still bad grammar. Say "suckiest" or "most horrible" next time...

<-- apologizes for her obsession with correct grammar. XD

But come on...we all know that the worst game of all time is ET for the NES...That, or the "All your base are belong to us" game...XD

Tom, I really think you need to calm down. In all honesty, it sounds like you're wanting to start a heated debate. And many of us around here do not like arguments around here.

And let's face it: Mario wouldn't want us to be fighting like this (unless we were talking about Smash Bros. )

You don't like Mario RPGs? Good. Some people like them.

Same goes for other series. I don't like survival horror games. Some people do. I do not start yelling at them for liking them, however.

And you others arguing back with Tom... don't fuel the fire! Y'all need to calm down just as much. He doesn't like Mario RPGs. That's okay. The other comments made go for y'all, too. Yep, indeedy!

There we go! All is settled! Let us go forth in happiness and bliss from henceforth!

(*End of rogie_san's super-negotiation skills... or attempt at skills )

Ok, you need to stop assumming things. I said Mario RPGs were nothing compared to other RPGs. i just said i hated SS while the Papers were OK, and i heard the SNES RPG was a great play from all my friends that hated the others.

It would be a heck lot funnier if this happened:

Tidus:"Yuna...."
Yuna:"I won`t loose you!"
Tidus:"I love you and...."
Yuna: "And....?"
Tidus:"And..."
Yuna: "Yes?!"
Tidus: "The Mustard is your doom!"

Sorry, but if it`s in a Mario game it`s not that funny. It`s hilarious in serious RPGs.

Don`t worry, I`m calmed down. i got bashed at the GameFAQs Board (TomDincht91) so I needed to let off some steam.

I'd say of the Mario RPGs, Super Mario RPG for SNES was my favorite. Having Culex as an optional boss ROCKED. It was nice to hear the ol' FFIV theme in it.

Superstar Saga was a close second. The combat engine was enjoyable, and the timing thing made sure that fights never got boring. That, and I liked the fact that Luigi was just "Mr. Green Guy" or "Green Dude" or "that person in green."

I never have cared much for the Mario Party games, and judging from the scores I've seen other game sites give the recent ones, most other people don't either.

I've never played any of the Mario sports games...oh, except Mario Golf, which was really fun...but also REALLY hard. I still can't get first place in Bowser's Course.

I never played the first Paper Mario, but I played and enjoyed the other three RPGs.

I guess it's a matter of taste.

*laughs* Tom your not old enough to hate on Mario. You gotta be down with the NES games. Thats cool oldschool.

Tom Dincht wrote:I didn`t complain and I didn`t say "ZOMG MARIO SUXXORS". What the heck is a "SUXXOR"?

I said: " Superstar Saga was the Suckiest Game".

suxxor = sucks

you could simply say "i really dislike super mario super saga" instead of going like "it's the suckiest game ever! i wanna throw it into heaps of garbage!"

i played it and i enjoyed playing it, i don't know about you

I`m sorry, but I know 9/10 people will disagree but my opinion must be heard.

no your opinion doesn't need to be heard

Mr. SmartyPants wrote:suxxor = sucks

you could simply say "i really dislike super mario super saga" instead of going like "it's the suckiest game ever! i wanna throw it into heaps of garbage!"

i played it and i enjoyed playing it, i don't know about you



no your opinion doesn't need to be heard

*sigh* I don't even know why I tried to say anything...

rogie-san's attempt at diplomacy has failed. *sigh*

*pats Rogie-san on the back* Well, it was a good attempt, anyways. *has already given her two cents, therefore she won't say anything else until she feels like it*

You guys need to all calm down. Don't make me get the hose out.

"Your life is but a caricature drawn by a kid that is stupid!"
-Fawful

Haiku to prove my point is below:

Volt wrote:Haiku to prove my point is below:

Sonic. Mario.
Your life is longer than it
should be. Please just die.

Nostalgic games are
peices that we must let go
for they now just suck.

Nintendo trying
but not progressing or new
same old ideas

Sega milking fans
we pay for 3D garbage
like the new sonic

-Haiku poems by Volt, thank you.

rofl thats great XD nice poetry there!

put it in the writing section!

Sorry I added some right before you posted

Shatterheart wrote:You guys need to all calm down. Don't make me get the hose out.

RUN!!!! IT'S FILLED WITH GASOLINE!!!!

*thinks* actually, shatter would never do that. He knows our dead burning bodies would rise to hunt him, in the smash hit "Revenge of the Flaming Gamers"

"Flaming Gamers." If that isn't the perfect euphemism for Nintendo fans, I don't know what is .

My thoughts on Nintendo should be well-known by now, but I thought that I should weigh in here in order to preserve the 9/10 balance (it was getting to be more like 19/20).

Volt wrote: Sonic. Mario.
Your life is longer than it
should be. Please just die.

Nostalgic games are
peices that we must let go,
for they now just suck.

Nintendo trying,
but not progressing or new.
Same old ideas.

That is an excellent summary of my thoughts on the matter. Thanks Volt!

blkmage wrote:It's a collaboration between Square and Nintendo before the dark times. Before the Empire.

Before Nintendo thought that it was a great idea to base a game console on $80 cartridges when everyone else was going with $40-$50 CDs.

Nostalgia is great, but it can easily stifle creativity. Remember: quirkiness does not equal innovation (let alone a Revolution).

In my opinion, the perfect example of Nintendo's failure to break away from it's old mascots and bring real innovation is the decision to allow players to download old NES, SNES, and N64 games on their next console. Rather than devoting energy to new titles, they are once again forced to rely on hyper-nostalgia (not just fondly remembering, but idolizing the "glorious past"). Of course most gamers already can play all of their old favorites (I'll leave the "how" to you ), unless they have the willpower to resist playing their favorite games for all of these years. Perhaps that isn't entirely accurate: they could have kept in touch with their favorites through Nintendo's endless rehash machine...

I had considered defending Nintendo, as I do believe that some of their Nintendo 64 games were original and interesting (even if they used old mascots), until I remembered that the 64 is two consules behind the current cutting edge. So instead, I'll say that personally I see nothing wrong with old characters and franchises... providing the games are more than rehashes of previous content.

Rurouni_Kaoru wrote:It was more like a classic RPG than Paper Mario was, since you had larger amounts of HP and more than one party member in battle.

Actually, I liked the "low-HP" aspect of Paper Mario. It made a characters "Defense" rating actually an important aspect of gameplay, rather than a stat that is nice to have, but mostly unimportant.

[Quote=Tom] my opinion must be heard.[/quote]

Not really...the Mario RPGs I've played are some of my favs.Quit your hating and let me frag you.

Thank you, UC.

Yes, Nintendo seems to be "behind" in alot of things, but I think the actual reality is that other companies are moving too fast and not focusing enough on quality.

I think I'll just stop right there and pray for this to stop before it becomes a console war.