Page 1 of 1
For those of you who still play WC III on battle.net...
PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:21 pm
by Mr_Anderson
i've started playing WC III again, and i noticed that the teams aren't really even. it seems that all the high level guys are on one team, even tho b.net is supposed to equal out the teams. has anyone else noticed that?
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:47 pm
by Tommy
Is that Warcraft 3 you`re talking about?
if so, is there such thing as War Craft I an II? I`ve only seen wc3 and wc3:frozen throne. Is that an expantion pack or sequel?
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:28 pm
by Mr_Anderson
yeah, warcraft: orcs and humans was the first one, then warcraft II, then warcraft III
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:37 am
by Mr. SmartyPants
WC II was so.... weird
and if i recall, WC I was for the DOS
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:27 pm
by Tommy
DoS? What`s that?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:47 pm
by Locke
Tom Dincht wrote:DoS? What`s that?
One of the first (and possibly best) OS's ( Operating Systems, like XP and Mac).
and I didnt know there was WC for DOS. I was too busy with Duke Nukem.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:49 pm
by Tommy
Duke Nukem. that title is familiar to me.
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:13 pm
by Kanrad
Duke Nukem was another cheap id game.
Yes, WarCraft: Orcs and Humans was Blizzard's first answer to Westwood's Command and Conquer. It retained a lot more of the Dune 2 style strategies than C&C.
Then came WarCraft 2: Tides of Darkness. It had everything the original WarCraft game did, and came out sooner than Westwood's next game, Red Alert. It was the first game where you could click on the units several times in succession to get a humorous response.